Lead-in to Wash.Post story:
"In what advisers billed as a major address, [Pawlenty] calls for tax cuts and smaller government."
Oh yeah.
Especially more tax cuts for the very highest brackets. Definitely. Why should we settle in the U.S. for having the most unequal distribution of income and wealth since the late 1920s? Why shouldn't we aim to have the most unequal distribution in U.S. history? Why shouldn't we try to duplicate the distribution of, say, Honduras in the 1950s? After all, there's no point in doing something unless you do it well.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
amen. go hard or go home.
Post a Comment